Key details

  1. Google released `gemini-3.5-transcribe-live` and `gemini-3.5-transcribe` on August 26, 2026.
  2. Both modes automatically detect and transcribe more than 85 languages and support custom vocabulary biasing.
  3. Live transcription uses the Gemini Live API over WebSockets and is designed for low-latency streaming.
  4. The non-streaming endpoint supports speaker diarization and word-level timestamps.
  5. Smart transcription can remove filler words, resolve self-corrections and produce structured formatted text.
  6. Google’s pricing page estimates roughly $0.009/minute blended paid cost for Live Transcribe and $0.005/minute for non-streaming Transcribe.
  7. Google cites Artificial Analysis average WER measurements of 4.0% streaming and 2.6% non-streaming.
  8. Live sessions are limited to 10 minutes; file processing supports up to one hour, or 30 minutes when certain advanced metadata features are enabled.

What builders should take away

  1. Choose live versus file transcription from the product requirement first: if you need diarization or word timestamps, the current live endpoint does not provide them.
  2. Use verbatim mode for compliance, evidence or call-review workflows where removing fillers or correcting speech could change meaning; use Smart mode for notes and polished dictation.
  3. Benchmark custom vocabulary with the actual product names, acronyms and alphanumeric identifiers your users speak rather than relying on aggregate WER.
  4. Compare cost per completed transcript including retries, diarization/post-processing and storage—not just the published per-minute model rate.
  5. For high-volume systems, keep the endpoint abstraction portable enough to benchmark competing transcription providers; the low per-minute price makes switching tests inexpensive.
  6. Review Google’s free-versus-paid data-use terms before sending sensitive audio through the free tier.

What changed

Google released two dedicated Gemini 3.5 Transcribe API models on August 26, 2026: `gemini-3.5-transcribe-live` for low-latency bidirectional streaming over the Live API, and `gemini-3.5-transcribe` for recorded audio through the Interactions API. Both automatically detect more than 85 languages and support custom vocabulary biasing. The file endpoint can add speaker diarization and word-level timestamps, while Smart transcription can remove filler words and false starts, resolve spoken self-corrections and format raw speech into readable structured text. Google’s current pricing page estimates a blended paid cost of roughly $0.009 per minute for live transcription and $0.005 per minute for non-streaming transcription.

Why it matters

Speech-to-text is becoming an application primitive rather than a separate specialist service. The new Gemini endpoints let builders use the same provider account for live captions, voice interfaces, meeting/call processing and downstream Gemini workflows while choosing explicitly between latency and richer transcript metadata. The price point is low enough that transcription can be embedded into high-volume features, but the two modes are not feature-equivalent: live sessions trade accuracy and metadata for responsiveness. Builders need to pick the endpoint based on interaction design rather than assuming the live model is simply a faster version of the file model.

Live and recorded transcription are separate products

`gemini-3.5-transcribe-live` provides continuous bidirectional transcription over WebSockets with sub-second responsiveness, aimed at voice agents, captioning and interactive dictation. `gemini-3.5-transcribe` processes uploaded or recorded audio and can spend more time producing richer transcript metadata. Applications should model them as different serving paths rather than one API with a streaming flag.

Smart transcription can produce edited text rather than a literal transcript

Google’s Smart mode removes disfluencies such as filler words and stutters, resolves inline self-corrections and applies punctuation, paragraphing, lists, dates and numeric formatting. That is useful for dictation and notes but materially changes the semantics of the output. When exact evidentiary or conversational wording matters, builders should use verbatim mode instead.

The file path supports richer attribution and timing

The non-streaming endpoint supports word-level timestamps and speaker diarization, while the live endpoint does not. Google documents up to one hour of file audio in ordinary mode, reduced to 30 minutes when features such as diarization or timestamps are enabled. Live sessions are capped at 10 minutes. These constraints can determine architecture before model quality does.

Custom vocabulary reduces the specialist-jargon penalty

Both modes accept custom vocabulary biasing for domain-specific words, names and acronyms. Google documents up to 1,000 terms, while noting that smaller targeted lists often work best. This can reduce the need for a separate post-processing correction layer in medical, technical, legal or product-specific transcription workflows, although teams should validate terminology on their own data.

The pricing makes endpoint choice an economic decision too

Google’s paid pricing estimates roughly $0.009 per minute for the live endpoint and $0.005 per minute for file transcription using its stated audio/text token assumptions. The file endpoint is therefore both richer and cheaper on the published baseline, while live transcription buys immediacy. Free-tier traffic can also be used to improve Google products, whereas the paid tier is marked as not used for product improvement.

Benchmark numbers need mode-specific context

Google cites Artificial Analysis measurements of about 4.0% average word error rate for streaming and 2.6% for non-streaming transcription. Google also publishes FLEURS multilingual results. Those numbers are useful comparison points but should not be treated as a guarantee for noisy calls, specialized vocabulary or code-switching; endpoint constraints and your own audio distribution matter as much as the headline WER.

What to watch next

  • Independent transcription benchmarks across noisy calls, accents, code-switching and specialist jargon.
  • Whether speaker diarization and word timestamps reach the live endpoint.
  • Longer live-session limits and batch-processing support.
  • How the effective per-minute price changes as Google revises tokenization or adds volume/provisioned-throughput tiers.
  • Whether Gemini’s transcription output becomes directly integrated with more agent/tool workflows in the API rather than only consumer Google surfaces.

Still unclear

  • Google API release notes describe Gemini 3.5 Transcribe as generally available, while some adjacent Google model marketing surfaces may still use preview language; builders should verify current support/SLA terms for their target platform.
  • The cited WER figures are benchmark averages and can differ sharply on a specific language, acoustic environment or jargon-heavy workload.
  • Google’s per-minute figures are estimates derived from token-consumption assumptions rather than a fixed per-minute billing unit.
  • Smart transcription intentionally transforms spoken content, so it is not appropriate when exact verbatim fidelity is required.

Sources

Direct reading behind this dossier.

5 sources
Introducing Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Google primary

Primary launch for live/file modes, language support, Smart transcription, custom vocabulary and benchmark claims.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Google AI for Developers primary_documentation

Current endpoint capabilities, duration limits, diarization/timestamp support and feature differences.

Audio transcription
Google AI for Developers primary_documentation

Current implementation guidance for verbatim and Smart transcription, custom vocabulary and transcript metadata.

Gemini Developer API pricing
Google AI for Developers primary_pricing

Current paid token rates and Google’s estimated blended per-minute costs for both transcription modes.

Gemini API release notes
Google AI for Developers primary_changelog

Primary source for Gemini Omni Flash GA, video extension, first/last-frame interpolation, resolution control and the September 30 preview shutdown.

Discussion

Discussion is reader-contributed. Comments are not part of the BTN dossier or its editorial evidence.

0 visible comments

Join the discussion

Keep comments useful and relevant. Reader contributions may be moderated and are not BTN editorial evidence.

Sign in to comment