Key details

  1. Released October 23, 2026 via Kimi API and product family; Highspeed endpoint also available.
  2. Official base API rates: $2 input, $10 output and $0.20 cache-hit per million tokens; 1M context.
  3. Artificial Analysis independent Intelligence Index 55; Terminal-Bench 4.0 67%; approximately $2.11 per evaluation task.
  4. Full weights promised by November 4, 2026; not published as of this research pass.
  5. Independent speed measurement ~73.5 output tokens/sec; model is relatively verbose.

What builders should take away

  1. Benchmark real tasks with your own tool-calling harness and measure cost per accepted result, not token prices or vendor leaderboards alone.
  2. Keep an API fallback and rate/cost controls while evaluating the Highspeed trade-off.
  3. Do not plan self-hosted deployment or infer an open-source licence until weight files and terms actually ship.

What changed

On October 23, 2026, Moonshot AI launched Kimi K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed through its web products and API. The base model accepts text and images, offers a 1-million-token context window and is priced at $2 per million input tokens, $10 per million output tokens and $0.20 per million cached-input tokens. Moonshot says Highspeed is two to three times faster at roughly twice the regular input/output rates. The company calls K3.1 Pro open-weight in its announcement but explicitly says the full weights will only be released by November 4; as of October 25 they are not yet available. Independent Artificial Analysis testing gives K3.1 Pro an Intelligence Index score of 55, 67% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, and an average cost around $2.11 per benchmark task.

Why it matters

A frontier-class coding and agent model available at a lower API rate than many leading alternatives changes model-selection economics for builders who measure outcomes rather than only tokens. But the model is verbose, and a cheap token price does not guarantee a cheap completed task. The independent benchmark's 73.5 output tokens/second is below its 81-token/second comparison median, and its task cost and long-running performance matter for agent workloads. Local deployment, licence terms and unrestricted fine-tuning cannot be assumed until the weights and licence actually ship.

The independent comparison is promising but task-specific

Artificial Analysis ranks K3.1 Pro fourth on its October 23 Intelligence Index with a score of 55, and reports 67% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 versus 13% for Kimi K3. Its test records 55,000 output tokens per evaluated task and roughly $2.11 per task. The vendor separately reports 65.7% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 under its own setup, a reminder that harness, settings and task sampling can change scores. Simon Willison independently tested API availability with a small visual coding prompt, not a full production reliability audit.

What the pricing actually buys

The published Kimi API price is $2 input and $10 output per million tokens, with cached input at $0.20. The optional Highspeed endpoint is advertised as two to three times faster but more expensive; teams should benchmark end-to-end time and successful-task cost rather than assume it always wins. A 1M context window and text-plus-image input broaden possible workloads but do not establish reliable recall at maximum length.

Open weights are still a future milestone

Moonshot promises to release full K3.1 Pro weights by November 4, 2026. Until downloadable files, a licence and deployment guidance are actually available, K3.1 Pro should be treated as a proprietary hosted model for procurement and compliance decisions. Moonshot says it deliberately removed some cyber-related training data for the planned open release; its safety measurements are vendor-produced and should not be confused with independent security validation.

What to watch next

  • Whether full weights, licence, architecture details and reproducible serving guidance ship by November 4.
  • Independent coding-agent success rates, latency, hallucination and cost under production-like harnesses.
  • Whether API pricing, context limits or Highspeed capacity change after launch.

Still unclear

  • Artificial Analysis tests are independently run but benchmark scores may not predict a particular customer's workloads.
  • Moonshot's internal benchmark, security and post-training claims have not all been independently reproduced.
  • Weight publication is a promise, not a completed release; licence and hardware requirements are not yet confirmed.

Sources

Direct reading behind this dossier.

5 sources
Introducing Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI primary_announcement

Launch, architecture, capabilities, promised weight date and vendor benchmark context.

Kimi K3.1 Pro launch benchmarks
Artificial Analysis independent_benchmark

Independent Intelligence Index, Terminal-Bench, output tokens and cost per task.

Introducing Kimi K3.1 Pro
Simon Willison independent_hands_on

API hands-on and differentiation between promised weights and current availability.

Discussion

Discussion is reader-contributed. Comments are not part of the BTN dossier or its editorial evidence.

0 visible comments

Join the discussion

Keep comments useful and relevant. Reader contributions may be moderated and are not BTN editorial evidence.

Sign in to comment